RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors compared the safety and pharmacokinetics of Iotrolan (water-soluble) in hysterosalpingography (HSG) with those of Lipiodol (oil-soluble). METHODS: Iotrolan and Lipiodol were administered intraperitoneally at doses of 100 mg iodine/kg to female rabbits. Retention in the body was investigated by x-ray imaging, plasma kinetics, and urinary and fecal excretion. Irritability in the abdomen was investigated by histologic examination. RESULTS: Iotrolan was entirely excreted into the urine within 2 days after administration. Conversely, Lipiodol was excreted into the urine, had a half-life of 50 days, and was retained for more than 21 days in the abdomen. Iotrolan induced no inflammatory reaction in the abdomen, whereas Lipiodol induced a marked abdominal inflammatory reaction, including granuloma formation. Iotrolan had no effect on iodine concentration in the thyroid; Lipiodol increased iodine concentration significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Iotrolan, which is a water-soluble and nonionic dimeric contrast medium, has potential greater safety for use in HSG than Lipiodol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MIYAMOTO et al. (1995) studied this question.