Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article points to the culture of productive and creative leisure among the mid-Victorian English working classes from the standpoint of domestic hobby-making, largely ignored by the historiography of leisure. Relying on previously unpublished primary sources, it analyzes a test case centered on a Lincolnshire agricultural worker whose model-building hobby became a lucrative career and a platform for self-improvement. Though his tale is fairly eccentric, it nevertheless demonstrates the broad range of popular leisure practices, mainly handicrafts hobbies, among working men and women. These leisure habits, the article argues, challenge the historiographic conventional dichotomy between work and leisure. To address this historiographical lacuna, the article proposes using sociological models such as ‘serious leisure’ hitherto excluded from the historical research, which explain the involvement of workmen in labour-intensive hobbies as a measure of their sense of self-worth and autonomy. It concludes that a devoted hobby career was not just an effective instrument of self-improvement, but also an expression of the legitimate demand of the working classes for recognition and acceptance into the civil body.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moshe Elhanati (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: