Key result
Medical management for NSTE-ACS is linked to ~46% higher 1-year mortality versus revascularization.
Why the study?
Regional differences in the profile and prognosis of NSTE ACS patients treated with medical management after angiography remain uncertain.
Does an in-hospital medical management strategy compared to revascularization affect 1-year mortality in NSTE ACS patients with significant CAD?
Cohort (n=8,387)
Yes
Does an in-hospital medical management strategy compared to revascularization affect 1-year mortality in NSTE ACS patients with significant CAD?
Hazard Ratio: 1.46 (95% CI 1.21–1.76)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.8% vs 3.6%
In NSTE ACS patients with significant CAD, medical management alone is used in about 20% of cases globally and is associated with higher 1-year mortality compared to revascularization.
May warrant individualized decisions in NSTE ACS; leaves open whether revascularization improves survival in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Regional differences in the profile and prognosis of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) patients treated with medical management after angiography remain uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from the Early Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes (EARLY ACS) trial, we examined regional variations in the use of an in-hospital medical management strategy in NSTE ACS patients who had significant coronary artery disease (CAD) identified during angiography, factors associated with the use of a medical management strategy, and 1-year mortality rates. Of 9406 patients, 8387 (89%) underwent angiography and had significant CAD; thereafter, 1766 (21%) were treated solely with a medical management strategy (range: 18% to 23% across 4 major geographic regions). Factors most strongly associated with a medical management strategy were negative baseline troponin values, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, lower baseline hemoglobin values, and greater number of diseased vessels; region was not a significant factor. One-year mortality was higher among patients treated with a medical management strategy compared with those who underwent revascularization (7.8% versus 3.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.21-1.76), with no significant interaction by region (interaction probability value=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 20% of NSTE ACS patients with significant CAD in an international trial were treated solely with an in-hospital medical management strategy after early angiography, with no regional differences in factors associated with medical management or the risk of 1-year mortality. These findings have important implications for the conduct of future clinical trials, and highlight global similarities in the profile and prognosis of medically managed NSTE ACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roe et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE ACS) (n=8,387). Medical management strategy vs. Revascularization was evaluated on 1-year mortality (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.21-1.76). An in-hospital medical management strategy for NSTE ACS patients with significant CAD was associated with higher 1-year mortality compared to revascularization (7.8% vs 3.6%; HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.21-1.76).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: