Four observers were trained in lameness assessment using a subjective scoring system with five categories, and observer agreement was investigated four times at different stages of training and experience. Inter-observer reliability increased with time and reached acceptable levels in the last session. Retrospectively simplified versions of the scoring system were satisfactorily reliable already at a fairly low training level. For experienced raters, the original scoring system with five categories is suitable in terms of reliability for on-farm welfare assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brenninkmeyer et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: