Using Mean Arterial Pressure in Hypertension Diagnosis versus Using Either Systolic or Diastolic Blood Pressure Measurements

Hypertension is a severe and highly prevalent disease. It is considered a leading contributor to mortality worldwide. Diagnosis guidelines for hypertension use systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) together. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), which refers to the average of the arterial blood pressure through a single cardiac cycle, can be an alternative index that may capture the overall exposure of the person to a heightened pressure. A clinical hypothesis, however, suggests that in patients over 50 years old in age, systolic BP may be more predictive of adverse events, while in patients under 50 years old, diastolic BP may be slightly more predictive. In this study, we investigated the correlation between cerebrovascular changes, (impacted by hypertension), and MAP, systolic BP, and diastolic BP separately. Several experiments were conducted using real and synthetic magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) data, along with corresponding BP measurements. Each experiment employs the following methodology: First, MRA data were processed to remove noise, bias, or inhomogeneity. Second, the cerebrovasculature was delineated for MRA subjects using a 3D adaptive region growing connected components algorithm. Third, vascular features (changes in blood vessel's diameters and tortuosity) that describe cerebrovascular alterations that occur prior to and during the development of hypertension were extracted. Finally, feature vectors were constructed, and data were classified using different classifiers, such as SVM, KNN, linear discriminant, and logistic regression, into either normotensives or hypertensives according to the cerebral vascular alterations and the BP measurements. The initial results showed that MAP would be more beneficial and accurate in identifying the cerebrovascular impact of hypertension (accuracy up to 95.2%) than just using either systolic BP (accuracy up to 89.3%) or diastolic BP (accuracy up to 88.9%). This result emphasizes the pathophysiological significance of MAP and supports prior views that this simple measure may be a superior index for the definition of hypertension and research on hypertension.