Key result
Junior orthopaedic residents show slightly lower reliability than seniors when measuring the acetabular index.
Why the study?
The reliability of acetabular index measurement by orthopaedic junior and senior residents in DDH screening requires validation to ensure accurate detection of acetabular dysplasia.
Is acetabular index measurement reliable when performed by orthopaedic trainees for developmental dysplasia of the hip screening?
Observational (n=470)
No
Is acetabular index measurement reliable when performed by orthopaedic trainees for developmental dysplasia of the hip screening?
Orthopaedic junior residents demonstrate slightly lower but still excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability compared to senior residents when measuring the acetabular index for DDH screening.
Trainees show excellent acetabular index reliability; leaves open whether measurements improve DDH screening outcomes in practice.
Background: Radiographic measurements are used for screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in children. The ability to detect acetabular dysplasia requires validated radiographic outcome measures. The acetabular index (AI) measurement has been shown to be a reliable measure worldwide. This study aims to test the reliability of the AI measurement in a DDH screening population by orthopaedic junior and senior residents. Methods: The review examined 470 radiographs taken during 4 yr (2016-2019) in a university hospital. AI measurement was performed by two surgeons, four senior residents, and four junior residents at three different times. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability for each group was assessed. Results: The intraobserver reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the AI measurement performed by seniors was excellent at 0.98 (confidence interval [CI] 0.98 to 0.99) for the right side and 0.99 (CI 0.98 to 0.99) for left side. Indistinguishably, the ICC for AI measurement performed by orthopaedic juniors for right and left side was excellent at 0.96 (CI 0.95 to 0.97) and 0.95 (CI 0.95 to 0.96), respectively. The overall ICCs for interobserver reliability for the AI measurement between professors, seniors, and juniors for right and left side was between good and excellent at 0.89 (CI 0.87 to 0.90) and 0.89 (CI 0.87 to 0.91), respectively. Conclusions: Orthopaedic juniors are less reliable in terms of intraobserver and interobserver variability in detecting DDH in screening program in comparison with seniors using AI measurement in a pediatric orthopaedic clinic. Level of Evidence: Level III.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elifranji et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) (n=470). Acetabular index measurement by orthopaedic junior residents vs. Measurement by senior residents and surgeons was evaluated on Intraobserver reliability (ICC) for right-sided acetabular index measurement (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97). Orthopaedic junior residents showed slightly lower intraobserver reliability (ICC 0.96) compared to seniors (ICC 0.98) when measuring the acetabular index for developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: