Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Efficient monitoring of soil moisture is becoming increasingly important. To understand soil–plant–water dynamics, we evaluate the potential of using a multiple‐coil‐array electromagnetic induction instrument and inversion software to map soil moisture beneath an olive tree. On twelve different days, we collected apparent electrical conductivity ( EC a ) data using a DUALEM ‐21S and the volumetric soil moisture ( θ ) using a bank of soil moisture sensors on opposite sides of the tree. Using EM 4Soil, we inverted the EC a data on five of the days and established a site‐specific calibration between estimates of true electrical conductivity ( σ ) and θ . The strongest calibration relationship between σ and θ ( R 2 = 0.65) was obtained for a full‐solution, S2 algorithm and damping factor of 1.2. A leave one out cross‐validation ( LOOCV ) showed the calibration was robust, with a root mean square error ( RMSE ) of 0.046 m 3 /m 3 , a mean error ( ME ) of 0.001 m 3 /m 3 and a Lin's concordance of 0.72. We subsequently evaluated the calibration relationship on the seven remaining days and over a drying period of 120 days. This approach provides information about the temporal evolution of θ by a LOOCV of validation with a RMSE of 0.037, ME of −0.003 and a Lin's concordance of 0.54. Improvement could be achieved by aligning the DUALEM ‐21S in the same orientation as the sensors, with time‐lapse inversion also being advantageous.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: