Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of sustainability-related provisions in pouring rights contracts between universities and beverage companies and assess differences by company. We conducted this cross-sectional study from 2019 to 2020. We submitted contract requests to public universities in the United States under public records laws. We coded pouring rights contracts for 4 types of provisions: 1) payments to universities for sustainability efforts; 2) provision of recycling bins to universities; 3) provision of energy-efficient equipment to universities; and 4) other sustainability provisions. We used Fisher's exact test to assess differences in likelihood of having any sustainability-related provisions and Cochran-Armitage trend tests to assess differences in the number of sustainability-related provisions between contracts with Coca-Cola versus Pepsi. We received 131 contracts from universities in 38 states. Of the 131 contracts, 81 (61.8 %) contained at least one of the 4 sustainability provisions (36 Coca-Cola; 45 Pepsi); one contract contained all 4. There were no differences in the total number of sustainability provisions by Coca-Cola versus Pepsi ( p = 0.13). Pepsi contracts were more likely to require payments for general sustainability efforts (OR 4.21; CI 1.91–9.26; p < 0.001). We did not observe any differences in the provision of recycling bins (OR 0.44; CI 0.14–1.35; p = 0.18), requiring energy-efficient equipment (OR 0.82; CI 0.28–2.40; p = 0.79), or having other sustainability provisions (OR 1.15; CI 0.55–2.39; p = 0.71). Over one third of Coca-Cola and Pepsi university pouring rights contracts did not have any sustainability-related provisions, representing a missed opportunity to support university sustainability initiatives. • Pouring rights contracts may impact campus environmental and sustainability efforts. • We coded for 4 sustainability provisions in US university pouring rights contracts. • Of the 131 contracts from 38 states – just one contract contained all 4 provisions. • Of contracts, 61.8 % contained at least one provision (36 Coca-Cola, 45 Pepsi). • Over 1/3 had no provisions, which is a missed opportunity to support sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin‐Neelon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: