Many communications during the pandemic emphasized COVID-19’s disproportionate impact on Black Americans. Articles highlighting such racial health disparities can act as a form of health information targeting , which can be threatening when aimed at marginalized identities. In Study 1, Black participants indicated a greater level of anger and distrust when reading a targeted article from a White male doctor, focusing on racial health disparities during the pandemic, compared to a non-targeted article. Source distrust was associated with decreased message persuasiveness and intentions to engage in safety behaviors. Moreover, a Black male doctor was generally more persuasive, mitigating the adverse effects of message targeting on source trust. Replicating these findings in Study 2, a Black male doctor/source was more persuasive than a White female doctor among Black women participants. Interestingly, perceptions of source bias and expertise showed a different pattern than trust, demonstrating the distinct link between distrust, targeted messaging, and threat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pietri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: