Key result
Continuous wrist-mounted sensors prove feasible for inpatient rehab assessment, with 60% achieving target heart rates.
Why the study?
It is unclear whether wearable heart rate sensors can be worn continuously in inpatient rehabilitation to assess cardiorespiratory training response.
Are wearable sensors feasible for continuously assessing daytime heart rate response in inpatient rehabilitation?
Observational
Are wearable sensors feasible for continuously assessing daytime heart rate response in inpatient rehabilitation?
Wearable sensors are a feasible, safe method for continuously assessing heart rate response during inpatient rehabilitation, revealing that most patients achieve target heart rates for cardiorespiratory benefit.
May support wearable HR monitoring in rehab; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether wearable heart rate (HR) sensors can be worn continuously in inpatient rehabilitation to assess cardiorespiratory training response. If feasible, these sensors offer a low-cost low-maintenance method for assessing HR response in this setting. We determined feasibility of wearable sensors for assessing HR response to daytime therapy activities in inpatient rehabilitation within a cardiorespiratory training zone equal to 55-80% of maximal HR (target HR [THR]) for at least two 10-min bouts, 3-5 days per week. Secondarily, we determined episodes of excessive HR (EHR >80% of maximal HR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects 44-80 years of age with diagnoses of stroke, cardiac disorders, orthopedic disorders, medically complex conditions, or pulmonary disorders wore wrist-mounted HR sensors day and night throughout inpatient rehabilitation. The proportion of subjects meeting THR thresholds and experiencing EHR episodes was quantified. Multiple regression predicted THR and EHR outcomes from age, sex, length of stay, and motor function at admission and discharge. RESULTS: Across subjects, 97,800 min of HR data were analyzed. Sixty percent of subjects met THR thresholds for cardiorespiratory benefit. Age was the single significant predictor of percent of days meeting the THR threshold (R = 0.58, p = 0.024). Forty-seven percent of subjects experienced EHR episodes on at least 1 day. No subjects experienced sensor-related adverse events, and no protocol deviations occurred from inadvertent sensor removal. CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects experienced HR increases sufficient to obtain cardiorespiratory benefit. Likewise, most subjects had episodes of EHR. Wearable sensors were feasible for continuously assessing HR response, suggesting expanded opportunity in inpatient rehabilitation research and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weeks et al. (2018) conducted an observational in stroke, cardiac disorders, orthopedic disorders, medically complex conditions, or pulmonary disorders. Wearable wrist-mounted HR sensors was evaluated on proportion of subjects meeting target heart rate (THR) thresholds. Wearable wrist-mounted heart rate sensors were feasible for continuous assessment in inpatient rehabilitation, with 60% of subjects meeting target heart rate thresholds for cardiorespiratory benefit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: