Why the study?
Lack of awareness among the general population and healthcare providers in Jordan contributes to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal management of chronic kidney disease.
A multidisciplinary expert panel developed a localized consensus statement and algorithms to standardize CKD screening, diagnosis, and management in Jordan.
Endorses multidisciplinary CKD protocols in Jordanian primary care; extends global guidance with local expert consensus.
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global public health concern, affecting millions of people worldwide and Jordan is no exception to this growing problem. CKD can be prevented or delayed through effective primary healthcare practices. However, lack of awareness among both the general population and healthcare providers (HCPs) contributes to delayed diagnosis and suboptimal management of CKD. Aims: The aims of the expert panel were to raise awareness and provide a multidisciplinary consensus approach to screening, diagnosis, and management of CKD, including identifying and controlling risk factors associated with this chronic condition. In addition, the aim was to develop treatment recommendations and algorithms to HCPs to ease the decision-making process and standardize management protocols. Methods: The multidisciplinary panel of experts from different specialties representing several medical societies met to discuss and review the challenges and barriers of CKD in Jordan. The experts also reviewed the relevant publications associated with CKD, including the outcome data trials and the international clinical practice guidelines on CKD. The multidisciplinary panel developed a comprehensive understanding of the current state of CKD in Jordan and the measures being taken to address it. Results: The multidisciplinary team of experts developed a consensus statement that is tailored to the local situation in Jordan. The panel provided standard recommendations and algorithms, addressing screening, diagnosis, referrals, and treatment of CKD. Conclusion: Early screening and interventional programs are crucial to delaying the progression nature of CKD and reducing its complications. Future follow-up is important to measure the impact of these recommendations and educational programs to HCPs on CKD detection and management and improving patients’ outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghnaimat et al. (2023) conducted a review in Chronic Kidney Disease. Consensus recommendations was evaluated. A multidisciplinary panel developed a consensus statement tailored to Jordan, providing standard recommendations and algorithms for the screening, diagnosis, referrals, and treatment of chronic kidney disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: