Key result
CMR perfusion dyssynchrony identifies significant CAD with ~89% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Perfusion dyssynchrony analysis was developed to exploit the high temporal resolution of stress perfusion CMR for detecting temporal differences in contrast wash-in across the left ventricular wall in suspected CAD.
Does perfusion dyssynchrony analysis using stress CMR accurately identify hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease compared to invasive FFR in patients with suspected CAD?
Observational (n=98)
Does perfusion dyssynchrony analysis using stress CMR accurately identify hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease compared to invasive FFR in patients with suspected CAD?
Perfusion dyssynchrony analysis using stress CMR is a robust novel approach that accurately identifies hemodynamically significant CAD and multi-vessel disease.
May support noninvasive CAD detection on stress CMR; leaves open routine use versus FFR pending prospective validation.
AIMS: We sought to describe perfusion dyssynchrony analysis specifically to exploit the high temporal resolution of stress perfusion CMR. This novel approach detects differences in the temporal distribution of the wash-in of contrast agent across the left ventricular wall. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were retrospectively identified. All patients had undergone perfusion CMR at 3T and invasive angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) of lesions visually judged >50% stenosis. Stress images were analysed using four different perfusion dyssynchrony indices: the variance and coefficient of variation of the time to maximum signal upslope (V-TTMU and C-TTMU) and the variance and coefficient of variation of the time to peak myocardial signal enhancement (V-TTP and C-TTP). Patients were classified according to the number of vessels with haemodynamically significant CAD indicated by FFR <0.8. All indices of perfusion dyssynchrony were capable of identifying the presence of significant CAD. C-TTP >10% identified CAD with sensitivity 0.889, specificity 0.857 (P < 0.0001). All indices correlated with the number of diseased vessels. C-TTP >12% identified multi-vessel disease with sensitivity 0.806, specificity 0.657 (P < 0.0001). C-TTP was also the dyssynchrony index with the best inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. Perfusion dyssynchrony indices showed weak correlation with other invasive and non-invasive measurements of the severity of ischaemia, including FFR, visual ischaemic burden, and MPR. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that perfusion dyssynchrony analysis is a robust novel approach to the analysis of first-pass perfusion and has the potential to add complementary information to aid assessment of CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiribiri et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (n=98). Perfusion dyssynchrony analysis (C-TTP) vs. Invasive angiography with FFR <0.8 was evaluated on Presence of haemodynamically significant CAD (FFR <0.8) (Sensitivity 0.889, Specificity 0.857, p=< 0.0001). Perfusion dyssynchrony analysis using a coefficient of variation of time to peak signal >10% identified significant CAD with 88.9% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: