Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) of a low-rank Naomaohu (NMH) coal was conducted with two solvents, cyclohexanone (CYC) and tetrahydrofuran (THF), to obtain extracts (E CYC and E THF ) and residues (R CYC and R THF ). The parent coal, extract, and residue were characterized by ultimate analysis, TG, FTIR, GPC, 1 H NMR, and solid-state 13 C NMR. The results showed that MAE process is more efficient than Soxhlet extraction. The solvent CYC exhibits a higher total extract yield of 8.3 wt % than THF, being 4.7 wt %, during MAE and more efficiency in extracting organic components of NMH coal, especially condensed arenes and macromolecular compounds. The average molecular weight of E CYC is higher than that of average aromatic cluster of NMH coal. Online pyrolysis–vacuum ultraviolet photoionization mass spectrometry was taken to determine the initial pyrolysis products of parent coal, R CYC, and E CYC . The distribution of initial pyrolysis products suggested that NMH coal and E CYC possess similar basic arene structures and E CYC is rich in macromolecular clusters with lots of side chains and bridge bonds. The chemical structure of E CYC could reflect the macromolecular network structure of NMH coal to some extent. This could be an effective method to understand the organic structure of coal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: