Key result
Upper arm vascular access is linked to greater reductions in carotid-brachial PWV than forearm access.
Why the study?
It is unclear if vascular access position in chronically haemodialysed patients is associated with differential changes in upper limb arterial stiffness and if these changes differ by gender.
Does vascular access position (upper arm vs forearm) affect upper limb arterial stiffness in chronically haemodialysed patients?
Observational (n=38)
Does vascular access position (upper arm vs forearm) affect upper limb arterial stiffness in chronically haemodialysed patients?
Vascular access in the upper arm causes a greater reduction in carotid-brachial stiffness than in the forearm, with more pronounced effects in males.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
VA position and gender may influence arterial stiffness in hemodialysis; leaves open optimal vascular substitute selection by site or sex.
Purpose. To evaluate in chronically haemodialysed patients (CHPs), if: (1) the vascular access (VA) position (upper arm or forearm) is associated with differential changes in upper limb arterial stiffness; (2) differences in arterial stiffness exist between genders associated with the VA; (3) the vascular substitute (VS) of choice, in biomechanical terms, depends on the previous VA location and CHP gender. Methods. 38 CHPs (18 males; VA in upper arm: 18) were studied. Left and right carotid-brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV(c-b)) was measured. In in vitro studies, PWV was obtained in ePTFE prostheses and in several arterial and venous homografts obtained from donors. The biomechanical mismatch (BM) between CHP native vessel (NV) and VS was calculated. Results/Conclusions. PWV(c-b) in upper limbs with VA was lower than in the intact contralateral limbs (P < 0.05), and differences were higher (P < 0.05) when the VA was performed in the upper arm. Differences between PWV(c-b) in upper limbs with VA (in the upper arm) with respect to intact upper limbs were higher (P < 0.05) in males. Independently of the region in which the VA was performed, the homograft that ensured the minimal BM was the brachial artery. The BM was highly dependent on gender and the location in the upper limb in which the VA was performed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bia et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Chronically haemodialysed patients (n=38). Vascular access in the upper arm vs. Vascular access in the forearm / intact contralateral limb was evaluated on Carotid-brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV(c-b)) (p=<0.05). Vascular access in the upper arm caused a significantly greater reduction in carotid-brachial pulse wave velocity compared to intact limbs than access in the forearm (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: