Key result
A 30-minute massage intervention did not significantly increase high frequency heart rate variability compared to a reading control in medical residents working night shifts (median relative change 62% vs 14%, p=0.16).
Why the study?
Shift work can have detrimental effects on health over time, and the effect of massage on cardiac autonomic activity and inflammation in night shift workers was investigated.
Does a 30-minute massage intervention improve cardiac parasympathetic activity and blood inflammatory markers in healthy medical residents working night shifts?
RCT (n=12)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does a 30-minute massage intervention improve cardiac parasympathetic activity and blood inflammatory markers in healthy medical residents working night shifts?
Absolute Event Rate: 62% vs 14%
p-value: p=0.16
A 30-minute massage intervention did not significantly improve cardiac parasympathetic activity or inflammatory markers compared to a reading control in medical residents after night shifts.
Massage showed no advantage over reading control on HRV or inflammation in night-shift residents; pilot data leave open parasympathetic effects for larger trials.
Background: Shift work is a necessary part of many industries; however, it can have detrimental effects on health over time. Purpose: This study investigated the effect of a massage intervention on the cardiac autonomic activity and blood inflammatory markers of healthy medical residents working night shifts. Setting: This trial was conducted at British Columbia Children’s and Women’s Hospital between February 2014 and June 2016. Participants: Included participants were generally healthy medical residents and were working rotating night shifts on a regular basis. Research Design: This was a randomized, controlled, crossover, open-label trial (NCT02247089). Interventions: Participants received either a 30-min massage intervention or reading control after consecutive periods of night shift. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was high frequency, a proxy for the cardiac parasympathetic activity, measured via heart rate variability. Secondary outcomes included other heart rate variability measures, blood markers of inflammation, and blood pressure. Results: Twelve participants were recruited (nine female) with median age of 28 years. There was no significant difference between the massage intervention and the reading control for the primary outcome, (median relative change between pre- and postmassage [interquartile range]: 62% [-1 to 150], pre- and postreading: 14% [-10 to 51], p = .16). Similarly, there was no difference with respect to blood inflammatory markers and blood pressure. Median high frequency significantly increased between pre- and postmassage (185 vs. 358 ms2, p = .04). Conclusion: This pilot study found no statistically significant difference between the massage intervention and the reading control; however, we did observe a significant increase in median high frequency from before massage to after massage, indicative of increased parasympathetic activity. This study may help inform planning of larger trials evaluating massage interventions on the activity of the autonomic nervous system and managing shift work stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fazeli et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Healthy medical residents working night shifts (n=12). Massage vs. Reading control was evaluated on High frequency (HF) measured via heart rate variability (proxy for cardiac parasympathetic activity) (p=0.16). A 30-minute massage intervention did not significantly increase high frequency heart rate variability compared to a reading control in medical residents working night shifts (median relative change 62% vs 14%, p=0.16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: