Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study aimed to evaluate the quality of sperm morphology reading skills of andrology technologists in a developing country who are responsible for the analysis of semen in their institutions or clinics. The 1-day workshop was held as a post-congress training course during the second World Congress on Practical Infertility Management and Human Reproduction, Mumbai, India. The workshop format consisted of four sections namely (i) pre-training test, (ii) lectures on morphometric characteristics and details of normal and abnormal spermatozoa (iii) a consensus training session and (iv) a hands-on post-training test. The results revealed that the workshop participants had very little or no knowledge of sperm morphology, because the pre-training % relative difference between the reference value and the participants was 188%. Following training, however, the % difference decreased to 37% and minus 22% post-training tests. These somewhat alarming results highlight the need for training opportunities and facilities for andrology technologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franken et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: