Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report reveals over 35-year survival with durable tumor regression in a pediatric patient with inoperable optic pathway glioma, suggesting potential long-term benefits of antineoplastons.
Optic pathway glioma (OPG) is a low-grade tumor developing along the pre-cortical optic pathways and can involve the optic nerve, optic chiasm, optic tracts, and hypothalamus. Objective: A male child with newly diagnosed and unresectable OPG is presented to 1) review the earliest use of Antineoplastons A10 and AS2-1 for the treatment of brain tumors and 2) demonstrate the efficacy of Antineoplastons in the treatment of OPG. On April 18, 1988, a seven-year-old male child presented to the Burzynski Clinic (BC) with headaches. Based on prior, non-enhanced MRIs and biopsy, an unresectable suprasellar OPG was diagnosed. Antineoplaston therapy was started on a “proof of principle” basis. Tumor response was measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain. Results: A brain MRI, performed on May 31, 1989, demonstrated an enhancing suprasellar nodule measuring 4.37 cm2. On August 24, 1990, brain MRI demonstrated a 0.96 cm2 enhancing nodule, indicating the achievement of a partial response (PR). Following higher dose intravenous (IV) and oral Antineoplastons, brain MRI performed on January 24, 1997, demonstrated a residual 0.4 cm2 enhancing nodule, indicating an enduring PR. All Antineoplaston therapy was discontinued on August 21, 2000. At last follow-up, > 35 years since the start of Antineoplaston therapy, the patient was healthy and showed no evidence of tumor progression. “Proof of principle” Antineoplaston therapy utilized in a seven-year-old male with unresectable OPG produced an objective response (OR) and prolonged overall survival. Antineoplaston therapy is an attractive therapeutic option for children with OPG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burzyński et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: