BACKGROUND: There is a requirement for a personalized strategy to make MRI more accessible to men with suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC). PURPOSE: To evaluate an optimized (Op)-MRI compared with biparametric (Bp)-MRI and multiparametric (Mp)-MRI for the diagnosis of CSPC. STUDY TYPE: Two-center, retrospective. SUBJECTS: A total of 346 patients from center 1 and 292 patients from center 2. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. ASSESSMENT: WI, DWI, and DCE) independently according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). For Op-MRI, two radiologists used an adjusted decision rule on Bp-MRI-assessed PI-RADS 3 lesions by determining early enhancement of DCE. Pathologies at biopsy and/or prostatectomy specimens were used as standard references. STATISTICAL TESTS: Performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kappa statistics were used to assess interobserver variability. RESULTS: Interreader agreement was excellent for all three MRI assessments (all κ values >0.80). Op-MRI had comparable sensitivity (senior/junior: 90.9% [261/287] / 91.6% [263/287]) and higher specificity (78.1% [274/351] /74.4% [261/351]) compared with Mp-MRI (sensitivity: 92.3% [265/287] / 93.7% [269/287]; specificity: 67.8% [238/351] / 68.1% [239/351]) and Bp-MRI (sensitivity: 91.6% [263/287] / 93.4% [268/287]; specificity: 71.2% [250/351] / 70.1% [246/351]) for the diagnosis of CSPC. Compared to Mp-MRI, Op-MRI spared biopsy in 80.7% (515/638) of DCE scans with similar performance accuracy. Compared to Bp-MRI, Op-MRI downgraded 25.2% (31/123) of lesions at a cost of missing 6.5% (3/46) of malignancies, and upgraded 45.5% (56/123) of lesions with a positive predictive value of 62.5% (35/56) in 123 equivocal findings. DATA CONCLUSION: The Op-MRI, using an adjusted PI-RADS decision rule, did not compromise diagnostic accuracy with sparing biopsy in 80.7% of DCE scans compared to Mp-MRI, and outperformed Bp-MRI by regrading PI-RADS lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bao et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: