Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacteria that infect human epithelial and myeloid cells. Previous work has established that chlamydiae are able to protect a cell against apoptosis induced by certain experimentally applied stimuli. Here we provide an analysis of this protective activity against the signal transduction during CD95-induced apoptosis. In HeLa cells overexpressing CD95, infection with Chlamydia trachomatis inhibited the appearance of apoptotic morphology, effector caspase activity, the activation of caspase-9 and -3, and the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria. However, caspase-8-processing and activity (measured as cleavage of Bid) were unaffected by the chlamydial infection. Similarly, infection with the species C. pneumoniae did not prevent the activation of caspase-8 but inhibited the appearance of effector caspase activity upon signaling through CD95. Furthermore, infection with C. trachomatis was able to inhibit CD95-induced apoptosis in Jurkat lymphoid cells, where a mitochondrial contribution is required, but not in SKW6.4 lymphoid cells, where caspase-8 directly activates caspase-3. Taken together, these data show that chlamydial infection can protect cells against CD95-induced apoptosis but only where a mitochondrial signaling step is necessary for apoptotic signal transduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fischer et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: