Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The compound {(mu-bpym)[Cu(AsPh3)2]2}(BF4)2 (1) has been prepared and studied in comparison with the triphenylphosphine analogue 2. Qualitatively, the structure of 1 with characteristically distorted copper(I) coordination caused by Ph/bpym/Ph sandwich interactions is similar to that of 2 and is approximately reproduced by DFT calculations for the model complex ions {(mu-bpym)[Cu(EMe2Ph)2]2}2+, E = P or As. In contrast, the dinuclear {(mu-bpym)[Cu(P(3-Me-C6H4)3)2]2}(BF4)2 (3) displays a distinctly less distorted metal coordination geometry due to the steric requirements of the methyl groups in the meta-tolyl substituents. The electrochemical reduction of 1 is less reversible than for the phosphine analogues; the one-electron-reduced form 1*- exhibits a broad, unresolved EPR signal at g = 2.0023. Resonance Raman spectroscopy of 1 shows the typical vibrations of the bpym ligand in agreement with the MLCT assignment of the long-wavelength transitions below 500 nm. All three dinuclear complexes exhibit luminescence at room temperature in the solid and in solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sieger et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: