Key result
Large-volume drainage of malignant effusion linked to reversible pericardial decompression syndrome with severe biventricular dysfunction.
Why the study?
Pericardial decompression syndrome is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication following drainage of hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion, requiring better recognition and management.
Case Report (n=1)
New heart failure following the drainage of a malignant pericardial effusion should prompt urgent evaluation for pericardial decompression syndrome.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Warrants caution during large-volume drainage of malignant effusions; extends recognition of reversible biventricular dysfunction in pericardial decompression syndrome.
Pericardial decompression syndrome (PDS) is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication that can follow technically successful drainage of a hemodynamically significant pericardial effusion. A 61-year-old woman with stage IVB lung adenocarcinoma presented with progressive dyspnea and edema. Computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated a large pericardial effusion with right ventricular diastolic collapse and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 65% to 70%. Emergent echo-guided pericardiocentesis removed 360 to 380 mL of serosanguineous fluid, followed by catheter drainage totaling approximately 1.51 L. The next morning, echocardiography showed new severe biventricular systolic dysfunction with basal sparing and only trivial residual effusion. High-sensitivity troponin remained 10 ng/L or less without a meaningful rise. The clinical course was managed supportively with close hemodynamic and echocardiographic surveillance, cautious diuresis, and low-dose guideline-directed therapy as tolerated. LVEF improved from a nadir of 15% to 20% to 50% to 55% at follow-up, with resolution of the wall-motion abnormality and no recurrent effusion. The temporal association with large-volume drainage, absence of recurrent pericardial constraint, low troponin, and reversible dysfunction supported PDS. New heart failure after malignant pericardial effusion drainage should prompt urgent evaluation for PDS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elhussain et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Malignant pericardial effusion (n=1). Pericardiocentesis and catheter drainage was evaluated on Development of pericardial decompression syndrome. Large-volume drainage of a malignant pericardial effusion resulted in pericardial decompression syndrome with severe biventricular systolic dysfunction that subsequently recovered.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: