Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the variability of the energy cost of running (Cr) during a simulated duathlon performed in outdoor conditions by elite duathletes. This duathlon consisted of 5 km of running, 30 km of cycling, and 5 km of running. The main result was the lack of significant difference in Cr between the two running bouts (210 +/- 10 mL d'O2.km-1.kg-1 vs. 217 +/- 10 mL d'O2.km-1.kg-1). This result is different from those observed during a triathlon, where an increase of energy cost of running bout has been reported. Furthermore, during a short-distance duathlon performed by well-trained subjects, none of the physiological (ventilation alteration, metabolic changes, or dehydration) or biomechanical factors that are classically evoked in triathlon research to explain Cr variability seem to be affected by the run-cycle-run transition. These results seem to minimize the negative effect of the cycle-to-run transition during a short-duration event in well-trained subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vallier et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: