Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The addition of a passive wrist to a single degree of freedom prosthesis has an effect on its functionality. The amount of impact is undetermined. Objectives: To measure the grasping function of a commercial single degree of freedom hands with and without two forms of passive wrist flexor. Study Design: Form-board and timed tasks. Method: Repeated measures with a single subject using a validated assessment tool. The test measured the function of one conventional, single axis, powered hand controlled by the same myocontroller format. It was used in conjunction with a passive three position wrist flexor, a wrist with compliance in the flex/extend and radial/ulnar deviation and compared with a hand without these axes. Results: The overall functional score of the hand alone was 80 out of 100. The use of a wrist flexion unit resulted in a higher score (83) and the compliant wrist achieved a score of 79. The addition of a wrist allowed improved performance in Power, Lateral and Tips grips for both wrist designs, in addition the Extension grip was improved with the compliant wrist. Conclusion: Wrist flexion had a positive impact on the functional score. It enabled some tasks to be performed quicker and with less difficulty. Clinical relevance The majority of prosthetic hands have pro/supination yet there is little evidence about what impact this, or any other motion at the wrist, has on the overall functional capabilities of a prosthetic hand (i.e. grip). A commercial myoelectric prosthetic hand when used with and without two different wrist designs can potentially improve grip performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Kyberd (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: