Chemotherapy, immune checkpoint blockade, HER2-targeted therapy, and anti-angiogenic therapy have widened treatment options for gastric cancer, yet residual disease and acquired resistance remain common. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are often classified as fixed subtypes, even though treatment exposes them to tissue injury, inflammatory cytokines, hypoxia, altered interstitial pressure, and matrix stress. We use treatment-shaped fibroblast state to describe a functional program that arises through reprogramming within resident fibroblasts, recruitment from a local mesenchymal source, or enrichment of a pre-existing state that survives therapy. An unpaired change in abundance cannot distinguish these mechanisms. The review follows four time points: the baseline ecosystem, acute therapeutic stress, the residual disease niche, and the acquired resistance circuit. Interferon-responsive and senescence-associated programs may be short-lived and either recruit or suppress immune cells. By contrast, persistent matrix, vascular, metabolic, and paracrine programs can protect residual tumor cells during treatment. Gastric cancer studies implicate TGF-β-SMAD, IL-6-JAK-STAT3, GAS6-AXL, CXCL12-CXCR4, NRP2, LOX, FAK, and extracellular matrix pathways. Longitudinal human evidence is limited and is sensitive to biopsy timing, spatial sampling, and single-cell dissociation bias. Translational studies should pair spatial specimens with collagen-turnover and extracellular-vesicle biomarkers, mechanically matched organoid-CAF co-cultures, and immunocompetent or humanized models. Treatment should disrupt or reprogram the state that sustains residual disease without removing fibroblast functions that support immunity or restrain tissue injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: