Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thin-slice CT provides finer anatomical depiction, but in some clinical settings, only thick-slice CT images are available, resulting in reduced visible anatomical detail. Simply resampling to a smaller through-plane spacing cannot alleviate partial-volume-related image degradation, motivating deep learning-based CT slice synthesis (CSS) as an auxiliary strategy. Here, we release Multi-ratio Slice Synthesis CT (MSS-CT), a multi-ratio real-paired dataset comprising thick-slice and 1 mm CT reconstructed from identical raw acquisitions, covering 3 mm-to-1 mm (500 pairs) and 5 mm-to-1 mm (1500 pairs) synthesis. Using MSS-CT, we developed BasicCSS as a reference model, evaluated it against representative CSS methods in a multicohort setting, and compared real-paired with pseudo-paired training. BasicCSS achieved the highest performance in internal and external testing, whereas pseudo-paired training led to marked declines across all evaluated methods, consistent with mismatch between simulated thick-slice inputs and clinically reconstructed thick-slice CT. Downstream consistency analyses showed that BasicCSS-synthesized 1 mm CT had higher consistency with real 1 mm CT-derived segmentation and radiomic outputs than conventional interpolation. In a two-radiologist reader study, synthesized 1 mm CT reviewed alongside original 5 mm CT as an auxiliary view received high usefulness and confidence-support scores. These results suggest that AI-generated thin-slice CT may serve as an auxiliary image when real thin-slice CT is unavailable, and that MSS-CT and BasicCSS enable reproducible benchmarking for future CSS development and evaluation under clinically reconstruction conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: