Passive radio-frequency (RF) sensing identifies drones from their control-link emissions without visual line-of-sight, motivating its use for airspace monitoring. Transfer learning for such systems often reuses pretrained spectrogram-image models, but architecture and front-end construction can confound apparent pretraining effects. We re-evaluated these factors on DroneDetect V2 (390 recordings; seven physical drone/controller units; four interference conditions) using inner validation and capture-group-disjoint outer tests. In an architecture-exact Audio Spectrogram Transformer comparison repeated with two seeds, ImageNet+AudioSet and ImageNet-only initialization were practically equivalent ( \(Δ\) macro-F1 \(=0.0008\) , 90% clustered confidence interval \([-0.0060,0.0074]\) ); both exceeded matched random initialization by about 0.075 macro-F1. In a post-primary single-seed matched full-band representation sensitivity analysis, symmetric Mel and an RF-adapted power-law bank yielded an ordering opposite to that observed in the originally specified pipelines, with both outperforming the paired linear reference. Broader interference-condition coverage also improved transfer to held-out combined Bluetooth+WiFi interference. The results do not support general hierarchies based on pretraining history or time–frequency representation family; instead, they show architecture- and implementation-dependent transfer behavior and substantial sensitivity to RF front-end design. Claims are limited to closed-set classification of the seven evaluated units, one site, and the tested preprocessing and acquisition conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alwateer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: