Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Solvent-free electrode manufacturing not only reduces energy consumption and cost, but also enables thick electrodes for high energy cells. However, thick electrodes often suffer from sluggish Li-ion diffusion, leading to low-capacity retention at fast charging. In this work, LiFePO 4 -based cathodes were dry-processed by binder fibrillation, and benchmarked with slurry-casted cathodes using a green solvent. By balancing thickness and porosity of dry-processed thick electrodes, we achieved similar C-rate performance as ∼50% thinner electrodes, such as 212 μm thick and 54.3% porosity vs. 99 μm thick and 34.5% porosity, leading to a significant enhancement of areal capacity by 47% at 0.1C and 72% at 1C. Moreover, a fair comparison of dry-processed cathodes against slurry-casted ones showed similar C-rate performance which was consistent with the ion diffusivities measured by GITT; however, dry-processed cathodes degraded faster during cycling at 0.5C. Consistently, XPS characterization revealed that dry-processed cathode formed larger amount of electrolyte decomposition products in cycling, such as carbonate compounds and Li x PO y F z . We believe it is due to higher exposure opportunities for cathode active particles to electrolyte within dry-processed electrodes, originated from the distinctive binder distribution versus slurry-casted ones. This study offers a new perspective on the adoption of dry electrode technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: