Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cyberbullying remains a pervasive threat across social media platforms, highlighting the need for reliable detection systems and transparent decision-making processes. This work presents a comprehensive framework for cyberbullying detection that integrates two complementary eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques based on Large Language Model (LLM) explanations and a SHAP value–based interpretability. The framework leverages different models for message classification (including Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting and Multi-Layer Perceptron) to identify harmful content analyzing message-level, user-level, linguistic and stylistic features. The proposed architecture is designed to pair predictive performance with explainability, offering both natural-language justifications and feature-attribution visualizations. To assess the usability and perceived quality of the explanations, a structured evaluation has been conducted with 100 participants, including students, IT professionals, and researchers. Responses have been analyzed with respect to the Co-12 explainability properties, enabling an in-depth comparison between the two XAI approaches. Results indicate that SHAP provides more detailed content-based insights, while LLM-based explanations offer clear and user-oriented presentation. The findings demonstrate the importance of combining complementary XAI techniques to support transparency in current social networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loseto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: