Experimental validation study demonstrates high-accuracy distance sensing in all-spherical optics, highlighting reliable standardization in optical metrology.
Chromatic confocal studies often report optical design and metrology performance using non-equivalent metrics, limiting reproducibility and practical comparison. We present a design-to-validation study built around a reproducible four-element, three-group all-spherical objective using CDGM catalog glasses. The objective provides an NA of 0.25, a 40 mm working distance, and a nominal 2.100 mm focal shift over 400–700 nm. The workflow separates calibration residuals, independently referenced errors, fixed-position repeatability, and paired-step response, and incorporates manufacturing-tolerance analysis. A monotonic PCHIP calibration produced a 2.31 mm empirical operating interval, while measurement and simulation agreed within 2.90% over their common 440.7–700 nm band. Positions excluded from calibration yielded an uncorrected RMSE of 1.561 µm. Under a predeclared engineering criterion, 1.0 µm centrally and 1.5 µm across the full range were the smallest tested steps that passed. Tolerance analysis identified cemented-group decenter as the dominant sensitivity with assembly refocusing. The principal contribution is a reproducible catalog-glass prescription combined with an error-separated validation protocol that establishes practical performance boundaries without conflating repeatability with absolute accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
倪云玲 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: