In vitro characterization reveals selective enzyme inhibition by a novel phenolic Schiff base, indicating potential utility against metabolic and neurodegenerative targets.
In the present work, we report on the synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of ( E )-5-(benzyloxy)-2-{[(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)imino]methyl}phenol Schiff base, C 22 H 21 NO 4 ( BDIMPh ). The compound was synthesized via the condensation reaction between 4-benzyloxy-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde and 2,4-dimethoxyaniline. It was characterized using 1 H, 13 C NMR and FT–IR spectroscopies, and its crystal structure was determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography. BDIMPh crystallizes with two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. The structural model also includes the reported disorder features, which are discussed on the basis of the crystallographic refinement. The two molecules of BDMPh have the same E configuration about the C=N bond. In the crystal, the independent molecules are linked to their inversion-related molecule via C—H...O hydrogen bonds. Hirshfeld surface analysis and two-dimensional fingerprint plots were used to quantify the intermolecular contacts present in the crystal. Quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) analysis was performed to characterize selected intra- and intermolecular interactions. The optimized geometry showed good agreement with the experimental X-ray crystal structure. The antioxidant activity of BDIMPh was evaluated using the DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging assays. BDIMPh exhibited moderate radical-scavenging activity under the experimental conditions and showed higher IC 50 values than the reference antioxidants. The enzyme inhibitory activity of BDIMPh was investigated against acetylcholinesterase (AChE), glutathione S-transferase (GST), α-glucosidase and tyrosinase. BDIMPh exhibited measurable enzyme-dependent inhibitory activity against AChE, GST and α-glucosidase, whereas comparatively weak inhibition was observed against tyrosinase. The IC 50 values were 2.899 ± 0.851 µ M for AChE, 3.850 ± 0.721 µ M for GST and 3.284 ± 0.738 µ M for α-glucosidase. Compared with the corresponding reference inhibitors, BDIMPh showed a slightly higher IC 50 value than donepezil for AChE, a slightly lower IC 50 value than ethacrynic acid for GST and a higher IC 50 value than acarbose for α-glucosidase. These results indicate an enzyme-dependent inhibitory profile rather than uniformly superior activity relative to the reference inhibitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghichi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: