Natural ventilation can dilute indoor-generated pollutants, but opening windows can also increase coupling to outdoor fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ). We developed a sensor-driven screening framework that combines sustained outdoor PM 2.5 with a pragmatic temperature–relative-humidity (T–RH) envelope to identify candidate natural-ventilation opportunity hours. Using harmonised AirGradient observations accessed through OpenAQ, we compared four residential communities—KL_TTDI (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), ID_BogorSelatan (Bogor, Indonesia), SG_Midwood (Singapore), and AU_Palmerston (Gray/Palmerston, Australia)—from 1 January to 1 February 2026 (local time), with 724–744 hourly bins per site. Sustained PM 2.5 was represented by a trailing 24-h mean and evaluated at θₚₘ = 15\; g\;m- 3 , matching the 2021 World Health Organization 24-h air-quality guideline value. The operational meteorological screen was 24 ≤ T ≤ 30\;^∘ C and RH ≤ 65% . Primary clean-hour fractions were 14.5% in KL_TTDI, 34.3% in ID_BogorSelatan, 30.8% in SG_Midwood, and 97.4% in AU_Palmerston, whereas standalone T–RH feasibility was 97.0%, 71.5%, 98.5%, and 20.6%, respectively. The resulting monthly regimes were PM 2.5 -constrained in KL_TTDI and SG_Midwood, mixed in ID_BogorSelatan, and predominantly clean but T–RH-limited in AU_Palmerston. The framework identifies outdoor screening opportunities; paired indoor–outdoor monitoring is needed before translation to occupant guidance or automated control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: