Compressed-air leaks create persistent parasitic demand, but machine-level condition monitoring is difficult because air consumption changes strongly with operating mode. LEADI (Leak Energy Anomaly Detection Index) was developed as an operating-mode-aware procedure that evaluates the deviation of directly measured flow rate from a local reference baseline derived from a stable post-repair condition with maintained pressure and low within-window variability. The method was developed on days 1–5 and evaluated on held-out days 6–7 from two one-week campaigns conducted before and after implementation of the prescribed corrective actions. With 60 min windows, LEADI flagged 19/19 evaluable pre-repair and 0/17 post-repair windows, with diagnostic coverage of 39.6% and 35.4%, respectively. A simple fifth-percentile flow comparator without operating-mode selection flagged 47/48 versus 1/48 windows. This shows that the low-flow region itself contains strong discriminatory information for separating the two periods. The role of the operating-mode layer is to restrict engineering interpretation to pre-specified eligible operating conditions. The flow-rate difference within the diagnostic operating condition was 122.0 L/min (95% CI 114.6–132.3). Over a common 168 h basis, measured volume decreased by 1370.8 m3 (28.90%), while a separate check normalized by pressurized time gave 28.12%. Because the specific energy consumption of the compressor station was not measured, the energy effect is reported only as a scenario for the same 168 h. The results support the applicability of LEADI as a selective decision-support layer for the investigated asset and the two observed conditions, without establishing universal leak detection or causal attribution of the observed change to individual defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Titova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: