Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study proposes a multi-stage decomposition framework for auxiliary power prediction of underwater vehicles to support energy management. Isolation Forest first removes outliers from the load record; Complete Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition with Adaptive Noise (CEEMDAN) then decomposes it, and the modes are aggregated by Sample Entropy (SE) into high-, medium-, and low-frequency sub-sequences; Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) further refines the highest-entropy sub-sequence; and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks predict each sub-sequence and sum the results. Validation on measured data adopts a leak-free protocol in which normalization, outlier detection, and decomposition never access future observations and all models are evaluated on the original, unmodified test targets; as the test segment’s mean load level is lower, bias-corrected metrics are reported alongside raw ones. The proposed method attains the best bias-corrected R2 (0.330) and NRMSE (0.109) among seven models, reducing NRMSE by 1.0% to 15.9% versus all benchmarks, while its MAPE (9.01%) stays within 0.71 percentage points of the best baseline; five-seed repetitions confirm that this advantage is not an artifact of a single training run, a capacity-matched comparison shows that it does not stem from the larger parameter count, and a 16-combination sweep indicates low sensitivity to the VMD hyperparameters. On the public Shifts vessel power dataset, the framework remains competitive (R2 = 0.885 ± 0.077 over three seeds), although the EMD–LSTM and direct baselines are superior there owing to richer exogenous features, delimiting the applicability of the decomposition cascade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: