Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper develops a test for evaluating linear factor models in high-dimensional settings. The proposed Maximum Random Sparse Portfolio (MRSP) test generates L random sparse portfolios, each obtained through K random draws, and then selects the hardest-to-price portfolio to assess factor model performance. By evaluating multiple randomly generated sparse portfolios, the MRSP test retains a portfolio-based economic interpretation while avoiding reliance on a single hardest-to-price asset. Under the null hypothesis and the stated regularity conditions, the centered MRSP statistic converges to a type I extreme value distribution. Monte Carlo simulations show stable finite-sample performance. In the empirical application, model fit generally improves in recent years, although the evidence varies across factor models and test assets. The 3-factor model of Daniel, Hirshleifer, and Sun (2020, Review of Financial Studies) performs best among the models considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: