Benchmarking study demonstrates superior multi-label classification accuracy across 16 datasets, indicating that direction-aware feature lifting enhances distance-based models.
Distance-based multi-label classifiers that rely on a fixed, non-adaptive metric—ML-kNN, RBF-kernel machines with fixed bandwidth, and analogous templates—compare instances through symmetric feature differences and therefore do not encode whether label evidence lies above or below a typical feature value; adaptive metric learning addresses this at the metric level and is complementary to the embedded feature-selection strategy we propose. We propose Paired Signed-Deviation Feature Selection (PSDFS), an embedded multi-label feature-selection method targeted at this family of classifiers. PSDFS splits each feature into above- and below-center nonnegative deviation channels and uses a paired group-sparsity penalty to recover one ranking over the original d features. For fixed fold statistics, the objective is convex in the weights; the multiplicative updates are monotonically non-increasing and satisfy a sublinear O (1/ T ) bound on average suboptimality. On 16 benchmark datasets evaluated with ML-kNN, PSDFS consistently obtains the best average rank among the compared methods on all reported metrics, with Holm–Bonferroni-corrected paired Wilcoxon improvements on Micro-F1 and Macro-F1 against all baselines and on Hamming Loss against all but one. Targeted controls show that the lift improves expressivity under nonnegativity, pairing avoids lift-induced splitting in the reported feature ranking, and the nonnegative constraint is empirically beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: