Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) has been associated with potential emotional benefits for patients’ families; however, its implementation remains controversial due to concerns among healthcare providers. This cross-sectional study was conducted between May and June 2024 at An-Najah National University Hospital in Palestine to explore healthcare providers’ perspectives on FPDR. A total of 167 healthcare providers, including nurses and physicians involved in resuscitation activities, were surveyed using a previously validated self-administered questionnaire. The findings indicated that a substantial proportion of participants perceived FPDR as a source of increased stress and legal concern, particularly among physicians. Nevertheless, more than two-thirds of both nurses and physicians acknowledged the family’s right to be present during resuscitation and recognized potential emotional benefits. Overall, the results highlight a clear tension between ethical support for FPDR and practical, legal, and emotional barriers to its implementation. These findings underscore the need for context-specific policies and targeted training to support safe and culturally appropriate FPDR practices within Palestinian healthcare settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdullah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: