Macro-scale earthquake forecasting on spatially discretized grids presents a severe class imbalance problem, where rare seismic events are embedded within long periods of inactivity. In Central Asia, forecasting \(M ≥ 3.0\) earthquakes on a weekly \(1^∘ × 1^∘\) grid produces approximately 96% zero inflation and an event prevalence of about 4.5%, yielding a constant Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve (PR-AUC) baseline of 0.045. This study investigates whether predictive performance under such extreme imbalance is governed primarily by model architecture or by structured feature design and baseline calibration. We introduce a framework that integrates tectonic regime-conditioned normalization, Omori energy decay proxies, structural fault descriptors, and log-odds baseline initialization that encodes historical cell-specific event rates directly into the learning objective. Across six heterogeneous architectures evaluated under a strict chronological split, performance converges to PR-AUC \(≈ 0.451\) and Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) \(≈ 0.844\) , representing a tenfold improvement over the constant baseline without synthetic resampling. The results indicate that under extreme low-prevalence conditions, calibrated baselines and physically structured feature spaces dominate architectural complexity, suggesting the existence of a macro-scale predictability ceiling in seismic forecasting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nurtas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: