Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper studies a finite absolute-difference experiment built from the gap sequences of the first 100,000 primes and an equal-length sequence of consecutive composite integers. The investigation began with a stronger qualitative hypothesis—that the composite-derived construction would collapse toward zero while the prime-derived construction preserved 1—which failed and is retained as part of the experimental history. Under the subsequently frozen primary protocol, aggregate zero density over the first 20% of difference depth produced an authentic composite-minus-prime effect of +0.0038769665387030083. Against 200 controls formed by independently and uniformly permuting the exact prime-gap and composite-gap multisets, none reached the authentic effect, giving a one-sided empirical value of 1/201 = 0.0049751 using the standard +1 correction. Post-primary mechanism diagnostics indicate that the prime-side behavior is strongly associated with positional parity/mod-3 structure rather than additional mod-6 information. For the authentic first-100,000-prime input, all values greater than 2 disappear by depth 96. A backward ancestry certificate reduces the row-80 large-amplitude survivors to a 993-node survival skeleton across rows 0–80, originating from 33 initial >2 ancestors in five localized channels. The paper distinguishes proved elementary properties of the absolute-difference operator from authenticated finite computation, permutation evidence, post-primary mechanism diagnostics, and open questions. No universal theorem about prime gaps or proof of Gilbreath's conjecture is claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kevin Mark Schimmel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: