Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Classical invexity ensures sufficiency of the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditionsfor nonlinear programming, but it relies on a single mapping η(x, u) and fails when feasibledirections depend on interacting components. In this paper we introduce Pair Invexity, ageneralization defined via a coupled mapping P : X × X → Rn. A differentiable functionf : X → R is Pair Invex at u ∈ X with respect to P iff (x) − f (u) ≥ ∇f (u)T P (x, u), ∀x ∈ X, (1)where P (x, u) = Ψ(η1(x, u), η2(x, u)) combines two directional mappings η1, η2 throughΨ. Under Pair Invexity, we prove that the KKT conditions are sufficient for global opti-mality and establish a single duality theorem that provides both a valid lower bound andzero duality gap at optimality. The framework unifies and extends invexity, Φ-invexity, andadditive invexity, and is illustrated with nonconvex examples where classical invexity fails.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DR. ZULFIQAR ALI KHAN (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: