Dear Editor, Conventional radiography of the SI joints is still recommended as the first imaging method for the diagnosis of axial SpA (axSpA) [1]. In many clinical settings around the world this is the only widely available imaging method to diagnose axSpA. In the analysis of the DESIR cohort, a significant proportion of patients with radiographic sacroiliitis that was obvious according to the local reader (41.5% for unilateral, 29.4% for bilateral) were considered as ‘negative’ by experienced trained readers (false-positive calls), while the proportion of false-negative calls was substantially lower [2]. This fact has large clinical implications, since the presence of definite radiographic sacroiliitis (usually defined as ≥grade 2 bilaterally or ≥grade 3 unilaterally according to the modified New York criteria [3]) is often considered as confirmation of the diagnosis of axSpA with subsequent application of axSpA-specific treatments. The absence of radiographic sacroiliitis...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poddubnyy et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: