The impact of measurement incidence angle (θ) on the accuracy of radar-based surface soil-moisture (Θs) retrievals is largely unknown due to discrepancies in theoretical backscatter models as well as limitations in the availability of sufficiently extensive ground-based Θsobservations for validation. Here, we apply a data-assimilation-based evaluation technique for remotely sensed Θsretrievals that does not require ground-based soil-moisture observations to examine the sensitivity of skill in surface Θsretrievals to variations in θ. Past results with the evaluation approach have shown that it is capable of detecting relative variations in the anomaly correlation coefficient between remotely sensed Θsretrievals and ground-truth soil-moisture measurements. Application of the evaluation approach to the Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien) European Remote Sensing (ERS) scatterometer Θsdata set over regional-scale ( ~ 10002km2) domains in the Southern Great Plains and southeastern (SE) regions of the U.S. indicate a relative reduction in correlation-based skill of 23% to 30% for Θsretrievals obtained from far-field (θ>50°) ERS observations relative to Θsestimates obtained at θsretrieval noise predictions made using the TU-Wien ERS Water Retrieval Package 5 backscatter model. However, over moderate vegetation cover in the SE domain, the coupling of a bare soil backscatter model with a “vegetation water cloud” canopy model is shown to overestimate the impact of θ on Θsretrieval skill.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crow et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: