Key result
On-line hemodiafiltration decreases enoxaparin anticoagulant activity by ~73% versus conventional hemodialysis.
Why the study?
The anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin sodium during on-line hemodiafiltration compared with conventional hemodialysis and the impact of dialyzer membrane type were not well characterized.
Does on-line hemodiafiltration compared to conventional hemodialysis reduce the anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin sodium in hemodialysis patients?
Does on-line hemodiafiltration compared to conventional hemodialysis reduce the anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin sodium in hemodialysis patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.19% vs 0.71%
p-value: p=<0.0001
The anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin sodium is significantly decreased during on-line hemodiafiltration compared to conventional hemodialysis, with the degree of reduction depending on the dialyzer membrane.
May warrant anti-Xa monitoring with on-line hemodiafiltration; leaves open whether dosing adjustments affect clinical outcomes.
To study and compare the anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin sodium during on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and conventional hemodialysis (C-HD). Enoxaparin was administered as an anticoagulant to 21 hemodialysis patients at the beginning of a single 4-hour OL-HDF session as an intravenous bolus dose of 80 IU/kg [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] On-line hemodiafiltration was performed using a high-flux polyester polymer alloy dialyzer and a total of 18 L replacement fluid (session A). One week later, the study was repeated in the same patients during a single 4-hour session of C-HD using a low-flux polysulfone dialyzer (session B). Blood samples for the measurement of Hb, blood urea and nitrogen (BUN), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and anti-Xa levels were taken before each study session and 5-minute postdialysis. In 13 more patients, the same study was performed during OL-HDF using a high-flux polysulfone dialyzer (session C). No differences were found between sessions A, B, and C when predialysis values for Hb, BUN, APTT, and anti-Xa were compared. The mean postdialysis APTT and anti-Xa values were 32.5+/-3.8 seconds and 0.19+/-0.11 IU/mL, respectively, in session A, 39.0+/-5.0 seconds and 0.71+/-0.17 IU/mL in session B, and 33.8+/-3.1 seconds and 0.35+/-17 IU/mL in session C (A vs. B, P<0.0001, for both parameters, A vs. C, P<0.003 for anti-XA, and B vs. C, P<0.005, for both parameters). The anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin sodium is decreased significantly during a 4-hour OL-HDF session compared with to a similar session of C-HD. The degree of the reduction seems to depend on the dialyzer's membrane.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sombolos et al. (2009) studied Hemodialysis (n=34). On-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) vs. Conventional hemodialysis (C-HD) was evaluated on Postdialysis anti-Xa levels (IU/mL) (p=<0.0001). On-line hemodiafiltration significantly decreased enoxaparin anticoagulant activity (mean postdialysis anti-Xa 0.19 IU/mL) compared to conventional hemodialysis (0.71 IU/mL; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: