Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Binding of concanavalin A to the cell surface of developing Blastocladiella emersonii zoospores was explored by fluorescence microscopy, electron microscopy and radioactive labelling. After labelling with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated concanavalin A, the fluorescence intensity of individual non-induced zoospores varied greatly. On the other hand, similarly labelled zoospores, induced with K+ ions for synchronous development, revealed a more even distribution of fluorescence intensity. The zoospore surface contained 4·3 × 107 concanavalin A binding sites per cell which were randomly distributed and closely attached to the surface. The affinity constants ranged from 7.5 × 107 m −1 to 3·5 × 105 m −1, while the Scatchard plot was typical of heterogeneous binding. Further developed cells, round cells and germlings contained 3.0 × 107 to 2·1 × 107 concanavalin A binding sites per cell which were mostly loosely associated patches protruding into the extracellular region. The affinity constants decreased appreciably compared with those measured at the zoospore stage. Specific concanavalin A binding characteristics appeared to correlate with the respective developmental stage of the zoospore.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jen et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: