Key result
LIBERAL-Trial protocol tests if liberal transfusion reduces major events vs restrictive strategy in elderly surgical patients.
Why the study?
Elderly surgical patients have reduced compensatory mechanisms for anaemia, and it is unclear if a liberal RBC transfusion strategy improves outcomes compared to a restrictive strategy.
Does a liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy reduce the composite of mortality and major ischemic events in elderly patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk non-cardiac surgery compared to a restrictive strategy?
RCT (n=2,470)
Open-label
Block randomization with variable block length stratified by centre
Yes
Does a liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy reduce the composite of mortality and major ischemic events in elderly patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk non-cardiac surgery compared to a restrictive strategy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study protocol outlines a randomized trial to evaluate whether a liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy reduces major adverse events compared to a restrictive strategy in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
BACKGROUND: Perioperative anaemia leads to impaired oxygen supply with a risk of vital organ ischaemia. In healthy and fit individuals, anaemia can be compensated by several mechanisms. Elderly patients, however, have less compensatory mechanisms because of multiple co-morbidities and age-related decline of functional reserves. The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether elderly surgical patients may benefit from a liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy compared to a restrictive transfusion strategy. METHODS: The LIBERAL Trial is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, controlled clinical phase IV trial randomising 2470 elderly (≥ 70 years) patients undergoing intermediate- or high-risk non-cardiac surgery. Registered patients will be randomised only if Haemoglobin (Hb) reaches ≤9 g/dl during surgery or within 3 days after surgery either to the LIBERAL group (transfusion of a single RBC unit when Hb ≤ 9 g/dl with a target range for the post-transfusion Hb level of 9-10.5 g/dl) or the RESTRICTIVE group (transfusion of a single RBC unit when Hb ≤ 7.5 g/dl with a target range for the post-transfusion Hb level of 7.5-9 g/dl). The intervention per patient will be followed until hospital discharge or up to 30 days after surgery, whichever occurs first. The primary efficacy outcome is defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute ischaemic stroke, acute kidney injury (stage III), acute mesenteric ischaemia and acute peripheral vascular ischaemia within 90 days after surgery. Infections requiring iv antibiotics with re-hospitalisation are assessed as important secondary endpoint. The primary endpoint will be analysed by logistic regression adjusting for age, cancer surgery (y/n), type of surgery (intermediate- or high-risk), and incorporating centres as random effect. DISCUSSION: The LIBERAL-Trial will evaluate whether a liberal transfusion strategy reduces the occurrence of major adverse events after non-cardiac surgery in the geriatric population compared to a restrictive strategy within 90 days after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03369210 ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meybohm et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Perioperative anaemia in elderly non-cardiac surgical patients (n=2,470). Liberal red blood cell transfusion strategy vs. Restrictive transfusion strategy (single RBC unit when Hb ≤ 7.5 g/dl, target post-transfusion Hb 7.5-9 g/dl) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, acute ischaemic stroke, acute kidney injury (stage III), acute mesenteric ischaemia, and acute peripheral vascular ischaemia within 90 days after surgery. The LIBERAL-Trial is a study protocol designed to evaluate whether a liberal transfusion strategy reduces 90-day mortality and severe ischemic events compared to a restrictive strategy in elderly surgical patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: