The current transformation of the digital health landscape is not only technological, it's also social, cognitive, and political, with the end goal participatory health-a partnership with digital devices collecting data and generating insights with new models of care evolving through partnerships of clinicians, patients, and carers.Most people are likely aware of the enormous challenges facing the world to deliver equitable, affordable healthcare to a world population that is growing, aging, undergoing increasing urbanisation, and suffering more chronic preventable diseases.Consumer expectations of their health practitioners are growing, and the cost of devices and medications are constantly rising.Increasing antibiotic resistance may challenge the very existence of hospital based care.Added to this, the looming impacts of climate change on communicable disease patterns, social disruption, and migration patterns together with the cost of climate mitigation will reduce the financial pool available for health care (1).How then can we use new technologies to keep up, or better yet, get in front of the curve, to reduce cost, improve safety, increase equity of access, reduce the burden on limited hospital facilities, and increase the overall health and well-being of the community at large?Regardless of the social or funding model, reducing avoidable complications through evidence based, personalised, connected care is essential.Increasing patient focus and patient control are necessary elements of the individual responsibility for health and wellness.Managing social determinants of health in our population also has the potential for increasing the return on investment of our health expenditure (2).For those of us working in health, the current convergence of wireless communications, miniaturisation of physiological sensors, Electronic Medical/Health Records (EMRs), mobile computing interfaces (including smartphones), advanced analytics, personalised medicine, and connected data repositories provides a source of optimism that dramatic transformation and improved cost effectiveness can be achieved in the foreseeable future.Examples include prediction return to work after rehabilitation or understanding factors that may lead to complications in health procedures (3, 4).There remain significant hurdles to overcome in our quest.System disruption from consumer wearable devices improves consumer-directed care, but this increasing independence may paradoxically isolate the patient from their care providers.Connection between data systems is dramatically increasing, but data aggregation and analysis is still limited by different vendor EMR data structures, competing terminologies and ontologies, jurisdictional data sharing, and privacy legislative differences.Telehealth has improved access to many forms of clinical support, however rural and remote communities still suffer from physical isolation and access to interventional services.As acute hospitals reduce the need for inpatient care, do we have the trained workforce to care for patients at home?Will telemedicine, remote monitoring, GP and community sectors be able to assume the load?How will the economic and regulatory enablers be established to promote appropriate outcomes?What then will be the role of digital technologies in identifying and supporting patients most at risk?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aickelin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: