Key result
Female sex carries comparable 5-year mortality to males after EVAR despite more type IA endoleaks.
Why the study?
Does female sex affect long-term survival, aneurysm-related mortality, and endoleak rates after endovascular aneurysm repair compared to male sex?
Cohort (n=1,263)
Yes
Does female sex affect long-term survival, aneurysm-related mortality, and endoleak rates after endovascular aneurysm repair compared to male sex?
Hazard Ratio: 0.89 (95% CI 0.61–1.29)
Absolute Event Rate: 34% vs 38%
p-value: p=.54
Despite more challenging anatomy, female patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair have comparable 5-year overall survival and lower aneurysm-related mortality compared to matched males, though they face a higher risk of type IA endoleaks.
Reassures on comparable survival after EVAR in women despite higher type IA endoleaks; leaves open sex-specific endoleak prevention strategies.
BACKGROUND: Women with abdominal aortic aneurysms less often meet anatomic criteria for endovascular repair and experience worse perioperative and long-term survival. METHODS: We compared long-term survival, aneurysm-related mortality, and rates of endoleaks and reinterventions between male and female patients in the Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global Postmarket Registry (ENGAGE) using 2:1 propensity score matching. RESULTS: There were 1130 male patients and 133 female patients, yielding 399 patients after matching (266 male patients, 133 female patients). Female patients were older, with smaller aneurysms, smaller iliac arteries, and shorter, more angulated necks, and they were more often treated outside the device instructions for use (all P < .001). Through 5 years, female patients experienced overall mortality comparable to that of well-matched male patients (34% vs 38%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.89 [0.61-1.29]; P = .54) and lower aneurysm-related mortality (0% vs 3%; P = .047). Female patients experienced higher rates of any postoperative type IA endoleak through 5 years (10% vs 1%; P < .001) but comparable rates of secondary endovascular procedures (14% vs 16%; P = .40). Female sex was independently associated with significantly higher risk of long-term type IA endoleaks (hazard ratio, 4.8 [1.2-20.8]; P = .04), even after accounting for anatomic factors. No female patient experienced aneurysm rupture during follow-up, and only one female patient underwent conversion to open repair. CONCLUSIONS: Despite more challenging anatomy, female patients in the ENGAGE registry had long-term outcomes comparable to those of male patients. However, female patients experienced higher rates of type IA endoleaks. Although standard endovascular aneurysm repair remains a viable solution for most women, whether high-risk patients may be better served with open surgery, custom-made devices, EndoAnchors (Aptus Endosystems, Sunnyvale, Calif), or chimneys is worthy of further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Donnell et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=1,263). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on overall mortality (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.61-1.29, p=.54). Female sex was associated with comparable 5-year overall mortality to male sex (34% vs 38%; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.61-1.29) after endovascular aneurysm repair, despite more type IA endoleaks.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: