The selective catalytic reduction of NO by CH4 was compared over In–Fe2O3/HZSM-5 catalysts prepared by impregnation and co-impregnation methods. It was found that the catalyst preparation method greatly affected the catalyst activity. The impregnated catalyst was very active, but the co-impregnated one showed poor activity. The In–Fe2O3/HZSM-5 catalysts were investigated by Mössbauer spectroscopy. The results showed that indium cations entered into the iron oxide lattice in the co-impregnated catalyst, while the impregnated catalyst exhibited a more stable structure, when both of the catalysts were treated severely in the reaction atmosphere. Characterization by means of combined in situ temperature programmed reduction (TPR)-Mössbauer spectroscopy further revealed that the performances of the two catalysts were different in the TPR processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: