We investigate preconditioned conjugate gradient methods for kernel ridge regression (KRR) problems with a moderate to large number of data points ( 10⁴ ≤ N ≤ 10⁷ 10 4 ≤ N ≤ 10 7 ). We develop and analyze two randomized preconditioners with complementary guarantees. For full-data KRR, RPCholesky preconditioning requires O(N²) O ( N 2 ) arithmetic operations for fixed accuracy under sufficiently rapid eigenvalue decay of the kernel matrix. For restricted KRR with k N k ≪ N centers, KRILL preconditioning requires O((N+k²)klog k) O ( ( N + k 2 ) k log k ) operations with no eigenvalue-decay assumption. Experiments on benchmark and scientific data sets demonstrate the robustness of both methods relative to existing preconditioners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Díaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: