Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The traditional state-of-the-art miniature directional microphones suffer from a higher noise level mainly due to size constraints. Herein, a miniature directional microphone mimicking the fly Ormia ochracea’s ear anatomy is presented with the prime focus on achieving higher signal-to-noise ratio at reduced size. The microphone has circular shape with aluminum nitride (AlN)-based piezoelectric readout scheme deposited at the center of the diaphragm. The 3-3 transduction mode is adopted for sensitivity enhancement. The microphone testing is performed in an anechoic chamber. Besides the bidirectional response, the A-weighted noise under broadband excitation is ∼29 dBA, which is lower than the optical directional microphone of Miles et al., which is the most prominent noise analysis work in the area of fly inspired MEMS directional microphone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishfaque et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: