BACKGROUND: Current regulation of drug approvals has caused considerable controversy as entrusted to the National Institute of Clinical Excellence, and has led to a lack of availability of modern medicines on the basis of calculations made of 'value'. AIM: We have examined the assessment tool used by National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) to establish the cost of drugs in order to assess whether it is a reasonable and objective evaluation methodology. DESIGN: A review of the methods of analysis. METHODS: An objective assessment of the value of the Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). RESULTS: We conclude that current methods used by NICE to assess drug costs are arbitrary, subjective and fail to reflect the true costs for patients, which are grossly overestimated. CONCLUSION: NICE needs to look again at the evaluation methods for calculating drug costs, and change their methodology from a subjective to an objective measure of true cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirkdale et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: